Nanopublications LDF server

Matches in Nanopublications for { ?s ?p " We applied the SAM analysis to identify 323 upregulated genes and 124 downregulated genes from the overall datasets; the values of the median number of false positives, the false discovery rate, and delta were 0.56%, 0.13%, and 0.897%, respectively. As a screening filter we also applied the standard deviation of the microarray datasets of both the AFC and OFC samples; candidate genes having folds higher or lower than twice the SD were selected...." ?g. }

• _3 value " We applied the SAM analysis to identify 323 upregulated genes and 124 downregulated genes from the overall datasets; the values of the median number of false positives, the false discovery rate, and delta were 0.56%, 0.13%, and 0.897%, respectively. As a screening filter we also applied the standard deviation of the microarray datasets of both the AFC and OFC samples; candidate genes having folds higher or lower than twice the SD were selected...." provenance.
• _3 value " We applied the SAM analysis to identify 323 upregulated genes and 124 downregulated genes from the overall datasets; the values of the median number of false positives, the false discovery rate, and delta were 0.56%, 0.13%, and 0.897%, respectively. As a screening filter we also applied the standard deviation of the microarray datasets of both the AFC and OFC samples; candidate genes having folds higher or lower than twice the SD were selected...." provenance.
• _3 value " We applied the SAM analysis to identify 323 upregulated genes and 124 downregulated genes from the overall datasets; the values of the median number of false positives, the false discovery rate, and delta were 0.56%, 0.13%, and 0.897%, respectively. As a screening filter we also applied the standard deviation of the microarray datasets of both the AFC and OFC samples; candidate genes having folds higher or lower than twice the SD were selected...." provenance.
• _3 value " We applied the SAM analysis to identify 323 upregulated genes and 124 downregulated genes from the overall datasets; the values of the median number of false positives, the false discovery rate, and delta were 0.56%, 0.13%, and 0.897%, respectively. As a screening filter we also applied the standard deviation of the microarray datasets of both the AFC and OFC samples; candidate genes having folds higher or lower than twice the SD were selected...." provenance.
• _3 value " We applied the SAM analysis to identify 323 upregulated genes and 124 downregulated genes from the overall datasets; the values of the median number of false positives, the false discovery rate, and delta were 0.56%, 0.13%, and 0.897%, respectively. As a screening filter we also applied the standard deviation of the microarray datasets of both the AFC and OFC samples; candidate genes having folds higher or lower than twice the SD were selected...." provenance.
• _3 value " We applied the SAM analysis to identify 323 upregulated genes and 124 downregulated genes from the overall datasets; the values of the median number of false positives, the false discovery rate, and delta were 0.56%, 0.13%, and 0.897%, respectively. As a screening filter we also applied the standard deviation of the microarray datasets of both the AFC and OFC samples; candidate genes having folds higher or lower than twice the SD were selected...." provenance.
• _3 value " We applied the SAM analysis to identify 323 upregulated genes and 124 downregulated genes from the overall datasets; the values of the median number of false positives, the false discovery rate, and delta were 0.56%, 0.13%, and 0.897%, respectively. As a screening filter we also applied the standard deviation of the microarray datasets of both the AFC and OFC samples; candidate genes having folds higher or lower than twice the SD were selected...." provenance.
• _3 value " We applied the SAM analysis to identify 323 upregulated genes and 124 downregulated genes from the overall datasets; the values of the median number of false positives, the false discovery rate, and delta were 0.56%, 0.13%, and 0.897%, respectively. As a screening filter we also applied the standard deviation of the microarray datasets of both the AFC and OFC samples; candidate genes having folds higher or lower than twice the SD were selected...." provenance.
• _3 value " We applied the SAM analysis to identify 323 upregulated genes and 124 downregulated genes from the overall datasets; the values of the median number of false positives, the false discovery rate, and delta were 0.56%, 0.13%, and 0.897%, respectively. As a screening filter we also applied the standard deviation of the microarray datasets of both the AFC and OFC samples; candidate genes having folds higher or lower than twice the SD were selected...." provenance.
• _3 value " We applied the SAM analysis to identify 323 upregulated genes and 124 downregulated genes from the overall datasets; the values of the median number of false positives, the false discovery rate, and delta were 0.56%, 0.13%, and 0.897%, respectively. As a screening filter we also applied the standard deviation of the microarray datasets of both the AFC and OFC samples; candidate genes having folds higher or lower than twice the SD were selected...." provenance.