Matches in Nanopublications for { ?s ?p "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 42 of
42
with 100 items per page.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.
- _3 value "from full text - Table 4 Overview of the genes that were significantly decreased after 24 h 100 nM cortisol treatment (F) compared to control (ctr) in subcutaneous (SC), omental (OM) preadipocytes or both fat deposits (SC only) - criteria: (1) genes with absent call in control and treated cell arrays were deleted; (2) genes with difference call of no change were deleted; (3) genes with absolute signal below 100 were eliminated; (4) genes with signal log ratio (SLR) below 1 for I (increase) or above K1.0 for D (decrease)were deleted(arbitrary cut-off point of twofold change) and (5) expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and hypothetical protein entries were not analysed." provenance.