Matches in Nanopublications for { ?s <https://w3id.org/linkflows/reviews/hasCommentText> ?o ?g. }
- comment hasCommentText "The modeling of the formalization reflects very well the scientific claim." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The literal for the rdfs:label of the super-pattern instantiation should contain the actual (rephrased) scientific claim (ideally in an AIDA sentence), not the doi to the article. This should be changed." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The modelling of the scientific claim (if we assume the claim is rephrased in an atomic way) seems correct." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The modelling of the formalization reflects very well the scientific claim." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I believe the formalization structure is good, reflecting almost all the details of the scientific claim. If the missing details about the "autosomal recessive disorder" were to be included, this would make the formalization complete in my view." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I believe the skos:related object should be <http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q898356>." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The general definition seems ok." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The context class chosen here is wrong as we are not referring to humanity as a whole, but to the individuals that comprise it. As such choosing the class "human" would be correct." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The name of the class needs to be corrected. The general convention when creating a new class in Nanobench is for the individual elements (words) of the class to be separated by a "-" and use capital letters only when the elements are acronyms." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I believe the correct qualifier here would be "generally"." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Very nice that all classes are defined in WikiData." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The label of the superpattern instance should be a short human-readable sentence, not the DOI of the original paper." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The provenance part should use the template 'generated from a formalization activity'." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "It seems to me that the object class should be something like 'excess or deficiency of vitamin A' and not just 'vitamin A'." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I think the label of the superpattern instance, in particular the 'essential regulator' part, is a bit stronger than what the superpattern is actually expressing. I suggest to revise the label a bit such that it better reflects what the formalization says." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The quote provided in the provenance seems to be a general quote from the source rather than the specific passage on which this formalization is based." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The provided label for the superpattern instance refers to 'licenses with a non-commertial clause' in general, whereas the actual formalization has the specific kind of license 'Creative Commons NonCommercial' in subject position. This should be make consistent in one way or the other." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The provided label for the superpattern instance refers to 'licenses with a non-commertial clause' in general, whereas the actual formalization has the specific kind of license 'Creative Commons NonCommercial' in subject position. This should be make consistent in one way or the other." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Overall, I think this is a good formalization." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I am a bit uncertain about the subject class. It is defined as a subclass of 'knowledge graph' but seems to be treated more like an instance. I think it would be good to better specify (in the formalization nanopub or the class definition one) what the instances of the class 'OpenBiodiv knowledge graph' really are (maybe the different versions/branches?)." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The provenance part should be using the template 'generated from a formalization activity'." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "With a protein class in the object position and a gene in the context, this raises for me the question what it means for a protein to be in the context of a gene. Maybe a class like 'presence of TAR DNA binding protein' in object position might make it clearer? But I am not sure..." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "This looks like a very good formalization to me." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "As humans typically belong to many different groups of different kinds, I am inclined to think that the context class should more specifically be 'social group of humans' (possibly with a quite technical and precise definition) and not just 'group of humans'." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I am wondering whether the "never causes" is a bit too strong a relation, also given the natural language sentence. "Never affects" might be more precise than "never causes". (This is also a stronger statement, more likely to be wrong, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.)" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The provenance part should refer to the original publication by using the template 'generated from a formalization activity'." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "This looks like a very good formalization to me." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I find the context class 'Digital Humanities' a bit confusing, as it is unclear to me what the instances of this class are. WikiData is not always very precise about this, but the superpattern is. I believe that a context class like 'Digital Humanities research' (as mentioned in the label) would make more sense." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The object slot of the superpattern refers to the nanopublication that defines the class, instead of the class itself (http://purl.org/np/RAiUYY1dbEDbcsscapEmbMMHsgJmjEJ1yUoNsxZIH1r90#transcription-of-stmn2)." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Apart from the object class link, this is a very convincing formalization." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for the review" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Indeed https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q874405 (social group) matches better than https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16334295 (group of humans) and thus was replaced." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The provenance is correct, the formalization is the result of a "FormalizationActivity" and the article and exact quote from the article of the scientific claim are present." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for your comment." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The modelling of the formalization looks good." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thanks for the feedback" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The original quote from the article has been replaced with a more specific one" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thanks, I updated the object class to http://purl.org/np/RAiUYY1dbEDbcsscapEmbMMHsgJmjEJ1yUoNsxZIH1r90#transcription-of-stmn2" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thanks, I updated the object slot to http://purl.org/np/RAiUYY1dbEDbcsscapEmbMMHsgJmjEJ1yUoNsxZIH1r90#transcription-of-stmn2" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thanks! m." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thanks! m." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Right - i see that adherence to the FAIR principles is a more specific form of adherence. the ontologist in me wants to make this a subclass :)" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Indeed, I misunderstood the quote part. The quote now comes from (the abstract of) the original article" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I agree that this can be confusing. In response to a formalization review comment (3), I added a new class "Digital humanities research"which is a subclass of the resource "research" in wikidata and related to the resource "digital humanities" in wikidata." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I agree that this can be confusing. In response to a formalization review comment (3), I added a new class "Digital humanities research"which is a subclass of the resource "research" in wikidata and related to the resource "digital humanities" in wikidata." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Changed to the suggested doi. Thank you" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The provenance of this nanopublication should be a FormalizationActivity and all the fields should be filled in in an appropriate manner: the link to the article, formalization author orcid, the exact quote from the article that contains the scientific claim." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The general structure of the formalization is good." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I would add a skos:related class with "metabolic abnormality" if such class exists." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Looking at this again, I think this formalization can be made more precise (and in a way simpler) by not using the universal context, but instead biodiversity data (Q28946370) as context and data reuse (Q58023280) as object." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "updated to reflect ecm binding as a property of the cancer cell" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "class updated" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Publication link included" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Ignored according to Cristina's recommendation" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "There is now!" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Yes! I am quite clever." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Class updated" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Provenance updated" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I agree" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for your suggestion, which was addressed." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for your suggestion, which was addressed." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for your suggestion, which was addressed." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "In another review comment (http://purl.org/np/RALWxVELKuqrkcO9ud2eXr0E2-ot5bl-0NpOIQi1ktrgI) it is specified that this naming is ok." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "In another review comment (http://purl.org/np/RALWxVELKuqrkcO9ud2eXr0E2-ot5bl-0NpOIQi1ktrgI) it is specified that this naming is ok." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "In another review comment (http://purl.org/np/RALWxVELKuqrkcO9ud2eXr0E2-ot5bl-0NpOIQi1ktrgI) it is specified that this naming is ok." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for your suggestion, which was addressed." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText ""autosomal recessive disorder" has been added as "genetic disorder" to declare the context of the assertion" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I adressed the good point made by the reviewer following his suggestion: mint a new class 'dysfunction of ERAD pathway' and then use this class in object position." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I agree that the object 'ERAD pathway' is not the appropiate. I addressed this minting a new class 'dysfunction of ERAD pathway' which is more accurate." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I changed the context with the more specific class 'genetic disorder' that is stated in the assertion but was not included in the first version, which is 'autosomal recessive disorder' thus declaring the congenital characteristic of this disorder." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I agree and I changed the provenance using the 'Generated by a formalization activity' template following reviewer's suggestion." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I agree and I changed the provenance using the 'Generated by a formalization activity' template accordingly." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "This is just a test with a long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long comment." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "This formalisation paper captures excellently one of the main claims made in the original article. I have a small comment regarding the style of the formalisation paper itself. There is no quote from the original paper and instead the paraphrased claim was inserted (sub:quote triple in the Provenance section)." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The provenance part of this SPI looks good. The content of the paper matches the content of the nanopublication." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "This class definition looks OK." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "This class definition looks good." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "It would be good to add a skos:relatedMatch reference to an identifier for PCI." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I agree with the way the class was defined and commend the author for linking it to a parent Wikidata class (gene expression). The only thing I would change is the uppercase 'and' within the class identifier between the two gene names." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The usage of dx.doi.org type of DOIs has been deprecated. Instead, the author should use doi.org such as https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-3-030-71903-6_32 ." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Here a 'cancer cell engaged in extracellular matrix' is defined as the intersection between the classes 'cancer cell' and 'extracellular matrix', but as the latter is defined as 'structure external to cells' this intersection is empty. I think this should rather be defined as a subclass of 'cancer cell' with some (possibly informal) link to the concept of 'extracellular matrix'." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Maybe using the "mostly" qualifier would have been better" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Maybe using "mostly" as qualifier would be best." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The provenance looks really good." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Very good information provided" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The content is very good" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The scientific claim does not seem to be atomic, as it mentions two genes, IRX3 and IRX5. I think it should be broken into two different claims, one for each of these genes." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The exact quote from the article should be specified, not the text of the scientific claim in the formalization." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The relation subClassOf was replaced with skos:related as it matches better the intended meaning. The new class is now related to both - the neocortex and size - classes." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The relation subClassOf was replaced with skos:related as it matches better the intended meaning. The new class is now related to both - the neocortex and size - classes." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for the review. It has been changed in the formal definition of class which is now skos:related to both - the cortex class and the size class in Wikidata." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I do have to agree. However, I changed it to affects instead of causes since it is a negation and leaves the option open to find a positive correlation in the future." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "The missing information have been added." assertion.