Nanopublications LDF server

Matches in Nanopublications for { <https://purl.org/fair-metrics/FM_I2#nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.assertion> ?p ?o ?g. }

• nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.assertion comment "FAIR Metric for Fair Principle I2" nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.provenance.
• nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.assertion wasGeneratedBy "FAIR Metrics Working Group" nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.provenance.
• nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.assertion title "Use FAIR Vocabularies" nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.provenance.
• nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.assertion author "Erik Schultes" nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.provenance.
• nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.assertion author "Luiz Bonino" nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.provenance.
• nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.assertion author "Mark Wilkinson" nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.provenance.
• nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.assertion author "Michel Dumontier" nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.provenance.
• nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.assertion author "Peter Doorn" nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.provenance.
• nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.assertion author "Susanna Sansone" nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.provenance.
• nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.assertion comments "michel: there must be a syntax and associated semantics for that language. This is sufficient mark: there needs to be some identity or denotation in the language; ('vanilla') xml and json are not FAIR, so should fail this test *** can you (i) identify elements and (ii) make statements about them, and iii) is there a formally defined interpretation for that -> HTML fails; PDF fails shared -> that there are many users of the language . acknowledged within your community -> hard to prove. . could we use google to query for your filetype (can't discriminate between different models) -> has a media type --> This SHOULD be stated as a IANA code [IANA-MT] standardization of at least this listing process is a good measure of 'sharedness' broadly applicable . that the language is extensible to a domain of interest . you can define your own elements in accordance with the semantics of the language gff3 is not in the IANA list -> what steps would the community need to execute to be listed here? cases like GFF, PDB are not broadly applicable biopax -> is defined vnd.biopax.rdf+xml and built on rdf -> allows users to create new elements and relate them jpg -> widely used, registered, but primarily for image content pdf -> registered, enables users to create their own dictionary. " nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.provenance.
• nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.assertion examples "None" nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.provenance.
• nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.assertion measuring "The metadata values and qualified relations should themselves be FAIR, for example, terms from open, community-accepted vocabularies published in an appropriate knowledge-exchange format." nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.provenance.
• nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.assertion procedure "Resolve IRIs, check FAIRness of the returned document(s)." nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.provenance.
• nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.assertion rationale "It is not possible to unambiguously interpret metadata represented as simple keywords or other non-qualified symbols. For interoperability, it must be possible to identify data that can be integrated like-with-like. This requires that the data, and the provenance descriptors of the data, should (where reasonable) use vocabularies and terminologies that are, themselves, FAIR." nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.provenance.
• nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.assertion relevance "All" nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.provenance.
• nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.assertion requirements "IRIs representing the vocabularies used for (meta)data " nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.provenance.
• nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.assertion validation "Successful resolution; document is amenable to machine-parsing and identification of terms within it. It may be possible to use FAIRSharing to validate these vocabularies." nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.provenance.
• nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.assertion distribution nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU._1 nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.provenance.
• nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.assertion distribution nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU._2 nanopub.RAVhLRWG-6ka_E58kiB9dgpWcsnzDdcDIa4YWrOwAYKGU.provenance.